Home
SaveWCAL
The USA's first listener-supported public radio station - WCAL 89.3 FM
May 29, 2007: St. Olaf refuses Kierkegaard House Foundation request 

Advertisement

Customize
29th-May-2007 04:21 pm
SaveWCAL Small
Because of recent developments in the WCAL endowment issue at St. Olaf, the Kierkegaard House Foundation, on May 14, 2007, asked the college to consider amending its 2003 Pledge & Endowment Agreement with the Foundation and to commit that it would not sell the rare book collection in the Kierkegaard Library and that it would use the Kierkegaard Library endowment funds (and its sub-accounts) solely to support the Kierkegaard Library and its visiting scholars.

On May 29, 2007, two days before the deadline for the Kirkegaard House Foundation $485,000 pledge-grant under the terms of the Pledge and Endowment Agreement with St. Olaf, the college responded to the Foundation and refused this reasonable request, stating: “St. Olaf does not wish to entertain any amendments to the 2003 Agreement.”

As a significant donor to the college, and as the principal donor of the rare book collection in the Kierkegaard Library at St. Olaf, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy Howard Hong '34 considers the WCAL endowment issue a direct analogy. He is very concerned that a future administration might sell the highly valuable rare book collection in the Kierkegaard Library (the largest in the world and assessed in the millions of dollars), and then argue that since the Kierkegaard Library no longer exists, that the college be permitted to use the funds in the Kierkegaard Library endowment (and its sub-accounts) for purposes other than what the donors requested.

This was a reasonable request of a significant donor, but the college would not yield and states that the Board of Regents must have total discretion as to how it might, in the future, use Kierkegaard Library endowment funds.
Comments 
4th-Jun-2007 04:48 pm (UTC) - Kirkegaard Endowment Agreement
Anonymous
Is it legally possible for the Kirkegaard House Foundation to revoke the 2003 Pledge and Endowment Agreement with St. Olaf?
14th-Jun-2007 12:26 pm (UTC) - Re: Kirkegaard Endowment Agreement
Anonymous
The college does not want reluctant donors.
15th-Jun-2007 04:28 pm (UTC) - Re: Kirkegaard Endowment Agreement
Anonymous
The college should stop creating the circumstances that create reluctant donors.
16th-Feb-2008 04:44 pm (UTC) - Re: Kirkegaard Endowment Agreement
Anonymous
The college declared the Kirkegaard House Foundation pledge null and void when asked to agree that it would not sell the rare book collection.
4th-Jun-2007 05:19 pm (UTC) - Looks like they don't trust them
Anonymous
Ah...it sure looks like a break down in trust is going on. That is a really bad sign.
7th-Jun-2007 02:37 pm (UTC) - I agree
Anonymous
Yes, it sure looks like people are starting to question St. Olaf and their practices. I would only wish they would do the same for MPR...
14th-Jun-2007 02:57 am (UTC) - Regent Arrogance
Anonymous
I think it is time for the Regents of St. Olaf to reconsider their responsibilities to alumni and benefactors. Their arrogance is costing the college applicants in the years to come and will hurt the institution's future development efforts.

The arrogance and myopic vision of the college leaders is an amazing phenomenon to observe.
25th-Jun-2007 04:39 pm (UTC) - The new president.
Anonymous
I hoped that when David Anderson, formerly an announcer at WCAL in his student years, was named president of STO that he would begin to make changes that could possibly lead to a more positive image of the school in my mind and the minds of many other alums that I know. I guess that hope, like almost all of the others I have come up with is a fantasy also. So, let's go full speed ahead, damn the torpedoes, attack, attack, attack and let the "chips fall where they may".

Oh yes, by the way, I receive the Gustavus magazine also and in the last issue counted 29 pages of the Gustie magazine given over to alumni, whilc STO had about ten or eleven (my memory may be faulty, but the difference was significant, nearly three times the space). Does that tell us something about our status with the current faculty/administration? Maybe.

Advertisement

Customize
This page was loaded Jul 18th 2009, 6:38 pm GMT.